know.

CookbookResearch and civic lifeNo. 47

A thesis research basechapter by chapter, argument by argument

Recipe No. 47 · Research and civic life

For: A history PhD candidate starting to write up

You get: A document per chapter, its argument on top, its evidence below

Time: A week, then half an hour a visit

See it in know.sh

The writing year on a Gantt chart, drawn from the chapter plan and supervision decisions, with the risk to the dates filed beneath. The supervisor is invented.

Thesis: baths and wash-housesNo. 37

Writing planto submission, September 2027

4 sections, 1,180 words, about 5 minutes, filed 22 September, revised 26 September.

Dates for everything left between now and submission, from the chapter plan and the supervision decisions. The campaign holds what waits on what; this holds when.

If the Hadley Bridge visit slips, Chapter 5 slips with it, and so does everything after. The eight weeks of revision are the only slack.

Sections

  1. 1Hadley Bridge: does the washers’ petition survive?QuestionAsked the archivist on 20 September; the visit is booked for 19 October either way.
  2. 212 September: drop Kellbrook, keep two townsDecision, keyFrees November for the Thornleigh ledgers instead of a third town.
  3. 3Supervision dates to submissionObservationMonthly with Dr Aske; the full draft goes to her at the end of May.
  4. 4What moves if a visit slipsRisk, 1 noteChapter 5 and everything after it; the revision weeks absorb up to a month.

A chapter as a document: the argument in the overview, then the evidence, the objection, the supervisor’s decision and the question still open.

know., Chapter 4 · Look up, New, ⋯

Thesis: baths and wash-houses, No. 34

Chapter 4 — Who bathed: tickets, classes and the penny bath

16 sections, 7,940 words, about 34 minutes, filed 2 May, revised 20 September, 6 highlights, shared.

☆ Star, Focus, Share, Move, Edit

This chapter argues that the penny second-class bath, introduced in Thornleigh in 1878, did more than the 1846 Act to make public bathing a working-class habit. Ticket returns show second-class use rising fourfold in six years while first-class use stayed flat.

The argument rests on the Baths Committee minutes and the surviving ticket ledgers for 1874–1890. Its weak point is Hadley Bridge, where the ledgers do not survive.

Sections

  1. Baths Committee cuts second-class price to 1d, March 1878 (Evidence, key). Minutes, 12 March 1878, f. 214: the committee resolved “to meet the wants of the labouring classes” at one penny. (highlighted)
  2. Second-class tickets, 1874–1890, from the ledgers (Evidence, key). Annual totals transcribed from ledgers 3 to 7, with the two missing years marked. (highlighted)
  3. The social-control reading (Risk, 2 notes). If the baths were imposed by reformers, why did use rise only when the price fell?
  4. 12 September: drop Kellbrook, keep two towns (Decision). Kellbrook’s records begin in 1892; comparison would need a different chapter.
  5. Who bought the penny tickets? (Question). The ledgers count tickets, not people. Does any diary or court report name a bather?

and 11 more sections

A modest job for a local model: one supervision decision filed in the right chapter, in the candidate’s own words. The supervisor is invented.

A local model through Ollama, connected to know.sh

You

Using know.sh, add a Decision section to “Chapter 5 — Washing days: women and the wash-house” on my shelf “Thesis: baths and wash-houses”. Title: “19 September: wash-house evidence to lead the chapter”. Body, from my notes: agreed with Dr Aske to open with the 1882 washing-day timetable, not the Act; move the Act to one paragraph; ask Hadley Bridge whether the washers’ petition survives.

search “Chapter 5 — Washing days” on Thesis: baths and wash-houses

section_add Added “19 September: wash-house evidence to lead the chapter” to Chapter 5 — Washing days, 12

A local model through Ollama

Added as section 12 of Chapter 5, filed as a Decision, with your three points as a list. I did not add a Question section for the petition; say if you want one.

How it works

A history thesis is written from two piles: two years of archive notes, and an argument that lives in your head. Your assistant files every minute book and ledger entry under the chapter it serves. You write the one thing it must not: each chapter’s argument, at the top of the page, with the evidence and objections beneath.

  1. Have your assistant file the archive notes

    Attach your typed notes a visit at a time and ask for an Evidence section per item in the chapter it serves, with your transcription word for word and the full archive reference.

  2. Write each chapter’s argument yourself

    Replace each placeholder overview with the chapter’s argument, in a few sentences of your own. If you cannot write that paragraph, you have found the chapter that needs thinking first.

  3. Keep objections and decisions beside the evidence

    File each counter-argument as a Risk in the chapter it threatens, and each supervision outcome as a dated Decision. A chapter with no Risk sections has not met its critics.

  4. Put the writing year on a Gantt chart

    Ask for a Gantt chart element in a Writing plan document: archive visits, drafts and revisions as bars, each draft after the visit it needs, submission and the viva as milestones.

Try this prompt

Your assistant, connected to know.sh (Claude, ChatGPT or a local model):

I am attaching my typed notes from two visits to Thornleigh Local Studies. Using know.sh, file each item as an Evidence section in the chapter document it serves on my shelf “Thesis: baths and wash-houses”. Title each with what it shows and its date, keep my transcription word for word, and put the full archive reference on its own line. Do not change any chapter overview.

Your assistant, connected to know.sh (Claude, ChatGPT or a local model):

Using know.sh, read the shelf “Thesis: baths and wash-houses”, including its Decision sections, and add a Gantt chart element to the overview of “Writing plan — to submission, September 2027”: a bar for each archive visit and each chapter draft or revision, each draft starting after the visit it needs, and milestones for the full draft, submission and the viva. Use only dates in my notes.

Made with

DocumentSectionYour AI assistantThe editorElements

See also